News & Reports Archives
These bulletins
are emailed to clients and friends prior to being posted online.
If you would like to be on our mailing list, please send us a request
via email. Thank you.
OPPORTUNITIES
ABOUND IN DEVELOPMENT
OF CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES
Risk Management
is the Key to Brownfields Projects
Good risk management
is not only the preventing of bad things from happening -- at its
most ingenious it is minimizing risk to create positive opportunities.
Go where others fear to go by having greater ability to control
the risks.
The federal
Superfund law has had real estate developers, buyers and lenders
staying as far away from contaminated property as they could possibly
get without actually leaving the country. The result has been such
properties have lain vacant and unproductive, the unintended result
of misguided legislation. Government has seen and reversed its error;
it has now passed a series of federal, state and local "Brownfields"
laws and regulations to remedy the situation. These have provided
sufficient limitations of liability to make real estate deals feasible
where they had previously been impossible. They also provide funding
to help grease the way.
EXPOSURES
NOW MANAGEABLE
Exposures under
Superfund had been absolute, making it impossible to insure the
risks or to transfer them effectively to other parties via contract.
The exposures have now been mitigated via Brownfields laws to the
extent that they are now responsive to normal risk management strategies.
Certainly, there is still residual risk, but it can now be managed
and managed well. For example, if cleanup costs can be estimated,
the possibility of the estimates being exceeded can be insured under
"cost cap" insurance. Relief from third party liability can be obtained
via contractual transfer or via insurance. All possible risks --
property damage, bodily injury liability, business interruption,
diminution of property value, etc, -- are contemplated and handled,
the cost of the risk management baked into the deal.
Wait, you say,
the risk management costs will overwhelm the project, extinguishing
the profit from the deal. Well, this is not true. Under Brownfields
the risks are no longer of the magnitude to make their management
prohibitive. There is certainly extra cost over the cost of a clean
deal, but the government is providing the funding to make up (or
more than make up) that difference. Depending on the project, federal
funding is available from the EPA, HUD and the Commerce Department,
possibly from two (maybe even three) sources on the same deal. Most
states, including Massachusetts, have their own funds that can be
tapped. Municipalities may be another source, creating something
of a benevolent perfect storm.
INSURANCE
MANAGEMENT IS PARAMOUNT
A complete risk
management program will involve a combination of insurance policies
and surety bonds (guaranteeing the work of remediation contractors),
and gaps can result from failure to mesh the two. Additionally,
the three most frequent complaints about Brownfields insurance (1.
it's too expensive, 2. they ask too many questions, and 3. they
never seem to want to pay claims) can certainly be avoided. These
complaints are caused by a misunderstanding of the use of the insurance,
a failure to understand the terms and conditions of the insurance
and a failure to properly negotiate the coverage.
Brownfields
give developers, new owners and lenders an opportunity for an edge
over competitors, and the possibility of a windfall profit. They
offer players the chance to go head to head on a basis (risk management)
with which their competitors may very well be unacquainted. With
the passage of the last domino, a new federal Brownfields law just
this past month (January, 2002), all the pieces are now in place;
the window will not open any wider and will close at some point
from here. The winners will be those who move expeditiously with
a knowledgeable team at their side. Once again knowledge is king.
Given
the inevitability of losses, you'll be judged not by whether you
were the victim of an event, but by how well you planned for it.
(C) 2002
Licata Kelleher Risk and Insurance Advisers, Inc. Permission granted
for distribution as is (with full attribution).
Contact
us for risk management strategy and implementation.
Licata Kelleher
is a risk management and insurance advisory firm. The firm does
not sell insurance, but does counsel clients on the effectiveness
of insurance, on reducing the cost of insurance and on the risk
management process.
The above
is intended to be general information, and should not be construed
as specific recommendations.
For more information, contact Debora Wu, at DWU@LicataRisk.com
News & Reports Archives
More News
May 8, 2008 THE STATE OF COMPUTER SECURITY
February 1, 2008 TERRORISM PROGRAM RENEWED
November 27, 2007 GLOBAL WARMING PANEL IN BOSTON RAISES KEY ISSUES
October 19, 2007 GLOBAL WARMING SYMPOSIUM
August 29, 2007 HURRICANE DEAN AN OMEN?
April 25, 2007 WHO'S LIABLE FOR PET FOOD CONTAMINATION-THE RISK OF PRODUCT LIABILITY
Reports
Fall 2005 INTERNATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Spring 2004 EMPLOYMENT LAW MORPHS INTO A MONSTER
Fall 2004 INSURANCE BROKER SUED BY NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL
Summer 2004 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF THE INSURANCE MARKET
Winter 2004 WORLD TRADE CASE UNVEILS INNER WORKINGS OF INSURANCE BROKER
Fall 2003 A RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH CFOs (AND THEIR ACCOUNTANTS) CAN LOVE
Summer 2003 PRESERVING COVERAGE FOR INNOCENT INSUREDS
Spring 2003 LEAVING TERRORISM COVERAGE ON THE TABLE
Winter 2003 COMPUTER SECURITY IS NOT A BLACK HOLE
Fall 2002 "LET'S BE CAREFUL OUT THERE
Spring/Summer 2002 WHAT WARREN BUFFET KNOWS ABOUT INSURANCE COMPANY FINANCIALS
Spring 2002 OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND IN DEVELOPMENT OF CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES
Winter 2001 "YOU CAN'T PAY US THIS MONTH? WHAT DO YOU MEAN 'NEW DEVELOPMENTS?"
Fall 2001 WORLD TRADE TERRORISM -- REPERCUSSIONS FOR INSURANCE MARKET
Summer 2001 ENERGY AVAILABILITY: CURRENT REALITY OR FOND MEMORY?
Spring 2001 "HOLD THAT BALLOT UP TO THE LIGHT"