News & Reports Archives
April 25, 2007
WHO’S
LIABLE FOR PET FOOD CONTAMINATION – THE RISK OF PRODUCT LIABILITY
China
the source of the problem
Pet food contamination
has been traced to Chinese suppliers. Wheat gluten purchased from
company in Xuzhou, China, north of Shanghai, contained the hazardous
material, and other Chinese companies are now implicated.
Food product
sellers have a special product liability exposure which is highlighted
by this incident. This applies to all players in the supply chain
from farmers to manufacturers to retailers. Liability arising from
death or injury can be substantial, and with products in general,
and food products in particular, there is the likelihood that the
defective product will affect large numbers of victims, resulting
in multiple claims.
With respect
to components (or ingredients) purchased from suppliers outside
the US, there are the further problems of uncertainty re quality
control, and possibly lack of recourse against the supplier. Some
foreign suppliers may not have substantial assets or may not carry
any or enough product liability insurance (this of course could
also be the case with a US supplier). Furthermore, distance and
difference in legal systems could prevent recovery. Plaintiffs who
cannot reach the ultimate culprit will go after the US company.
These same recovery problems would apply to your insurer as it tries
to subrogate after paying your claims.
Risk Management
Consider the following in managing your product liability risk:
•
Know the ultimate source of components you buy from K
Ksuppliers; consider your immediate supplier may not be
Kthe originator.
•
Know the level of product quality, and government oversight
Kof same, of the source country.
•
Obtain indemnification and insurance protection from suppliers
Kif you are simply a downstream distributor.
•
Review your product liability limits for adequacy with an
Kunderstanding of how your limits
apply: per claim or aggregate.
KIf your limits are on an “aggregate”
basis, this is all the
Kprotection you will have for all
claims in total.
•
Make sure there is full disclosure to underwriters of the
Kexposure, and this could include
disclosure of suppliers.
•
Don’t necessarily rely on inspection or analysis provided
by
Kthe foreign supplier; it may be
necessary to have this verified
Kin the US.
For more information, or to attend, contact Debora Wu, at DWu@LicataRisk.com
News & Reports Archives
More News
May 8, 2008 THE STATE OF COMPUTER SECURITY
February 1, 2008 TERRORISM PROGRAM RENEWED
November 27, 2007 GLOBAL WARMING PANEL IN BOSTON RAISES KEY ISSUES
October 19, 2007 GLOBAL WARMING SYMPOSIUM
August 29, 2007 HURRICANE DEAN AN OMEN?
April 25, 2007 WHO'S LIABLE FOR PET FOOD CONTAMINATION-THE RISK OF PRODUCT LIABILITY
Reports
Fall 2005 INTERNATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Spring 2004 EMPLOYMENT LAW MORPHS INTO A MONSTER
Fall 2004 INSURANCE BROKER SUED BY NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL
Summer 2004 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF THE INSURANCE MARKET
Winter 2004 WORLD TRADE CASE UNVEILS INNER WORKINGS OF INSURANCE BROKER
Fall 2003 A RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH CFOs (AND THEIR ACCOUNTANTS) CAN LOVE
Summer 2003 PRESERVING COVERAGE FOR INNOCENT INSUREDS
Spring 2003 LEAVING TERRORISM COVERAGE ON THE TABLE
Winter 2003 COMPUTER SECURITY IS NOT A BLACK HOLE
Fall 2002 "LET'S BE CAREFUL OUT THERE
Spring/Summer 2002 WHAT WARREN BUFFET KNOWS ABOUT INSURANCE COMPANY FINANCIALS
Spring 2002 OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND IN DEVELOPMENT OF CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES
Winter 2001 "YOU CAN'T PAY US THIS MONTH? WHAT DO YOU MEAN 'NEW DEVELOPMENTS?"
Fall 2001 WORLD TRADE TERRORISM -- REPERCUSSIONS FOR INSURANCE MARKET
Summer 2001 ENERGY AVAILABILITY: CURRENT REALITY OR FOND MEMORY?
Spring 2001 "HOLD THAT BALLOT UP TO THE LIGHT"